Reservation of Rights
Markel is dealing with the claim while preserving one or more potential arguments about policy coverage.
Professional Indemnity Insurers
A professional negligence claim against your business and a professional indemnity coverage issue with Markel are not the same dispute.
If Markel has reserved its rights, questioned notification, raised a policy issue or declined indemnity, Insurance Dispute Service can independently examine the policy, correspondence and evidence and help you understand what position needs to be protected.
Your Problem
The issue often begins with a claim from a client but becomes more complicated when questions arise about the insurance protection expected to respond.
Markel is dealing with the claim while preserving one or more potential arguments about policy coverage.
The insurer says some or all of the professional negligence claim falls outside the policy.
An earlier complaint, circumstance or event is said to have required notification sooner.
Questions are being raised about what the business knew before the relevant policy began or renewed.
Markel is relying on an exclusion, definition, condition or insured-activity issue to restrict cover.
Questions have arisen about legal costs, policy limits, settlement authority or the way the defence is being handled.
Who Is Markel?
Markel operates in the UK professional and financial risks market and provides professional indemnity insurance across both national and London Market business.
Its London Market professional indemnity team publicly identifies cover for professions including accountants, architects and engineers, insurance brokers, financial advisers and business consultants.
Markel also states that it has dedicated professional indemnity claims specialists handling claims from the UK and internationally.
Importantly, the word “Markel” on correspondence is not a substitute for checking the precise insurer, policy wording, schedule and claims arrangements applicable to your business.
This is not a technicality.
Markel states that its international insurance business can involve different insurance companies and Lloyd’s syndicate arrangements. RICS, for example, currently lists both Markel International Insurance Company Limited and Lloyd’s Syndicate 3000 Markel within its UK PII insurer list.
Other Markel products may be written or distributed through different arrangements.
The starting point should therefore be the policy schedule, certificate, wording and broker documentation rather than assuming that every policy bearing the Markel name operates identically.
How Did You End Up Dealing With Markel?
Understanding the sequence can be critical where notification, prior circumstances or the relevant policy period becomes disputed.
Advice, design, valuation, consultancy or another professional service is provided to a client.
A complaint, potential error, financial loss or other circumstance begins to develop.
The business or its broker notifies the relevant PI insurer of a claim or circumstance.
Claims specialists consider the notification, underlying allegation and applicable policy.
Indemnity may be confirmed, questions raised, rights reserved or coverage disputed.
Important: this is an illustrative journey. The actual notification and coverage requirements depend on the precise Markel policy and circumstances of the claim.
One Claim — Two Different Questions
Did your business owe the alleged duty? Was it breached? Did the alleged failure actually cause the loss? Is the amount being claimed properly supported?
Those questions concern the merits and value of the claim being made against the professional.
Does the relevant policy respond? Was notification made in accordance with its terms? Is the work within the insured professional activities? Is an exclusion or prior circumstance being relied upon?
A strong defence to the claimant does not automatically resolve a coverage problem — and a coverage dispute does not stop the underlying claim from continuing.
What Can Be Examined?
The relevant issues depend on the wording and facts, but professional indemnity disputes commonly require careful examination of the following areas.
What happened, when was it first known and what exactly did the policy require to be notified?
Which policy and policy year potentially responds to the claim or notified circumstance?
What did the business actually know before inception or renewal, and how significant was it at the time?
Does the work complained about fall within the activities insured by the policy?
What wording is being relied upon and does it apply to the facts alleged?
If disclosure is questioned, what was known, what was presented and what underwriting consequence is alleged?
How much cover is actually available and are multiple claims said to be connected or aggregated?
What does the policy say about legal costs, control of the defence and settlement decisions?
The underlying claim is already demanding attention, but now Markel has raised a separate question about whether, or to what extent, the policy responds.
That can leave a professional dealing with the claimant, the insurance position, lawyers and procedural deadlines at the same time.
Insurance Dispute Service can review the Markel policy, schedule, notification history, reservation or declinature correspondence and the underlying professional claim.
We identify what the insurer is actually relying upon, what evidence supports or undermines that position and what realistic routes remain available.
Where appropriate, that can include further insurer challenge, evidence preparation, professional claims defence, specialist barrister input or litigation support.
Related Professional Indemnity Issues
The wider IDS guide to notification, coverage and PI claims.
Explore PI disputes → Markel Has Reserved Its Rights?Understand what a reservation means and what should be examined next.
Reservation of rights → Insurer Refusing IndemnityWhere the insurer has moved from questioning cover to declining some or all of the claim.
Refused indemnity → Insurer-Appointed SolicitorsUnderstand the defence arrangement, retainer and any coverage issue sitting alongside it.
Appointed solicitors →What to Send Us
Frequently Asked Questions
Not necessarily. A reservation generally preserves one or more potential coverage arguments while the position is considered. The important questions are what rights have been reserved, which policy terms are being relied upon and what factual assumptions support the reservation.
Notification disputes are highly dependent on the wording and chronology. The relevant questions can include what was known, when it became known, whether it met the policy’s notification test and what was communicated to the insurer or broker.
No. Professional indemnity cover can differ by profession, product, underwriting entity, policy year and wording. The policy schedule and wording for the particular insured business should be checked rather than relying on general descriptions of Markel cover.
The appointment may be entirely appropriate for the defence of the underlying claim. It is still important to understand the solicitors’ retainer, whether indemnity has been confirmed and whether any separate coverage issue remains unresolved.
The actual work performed, the claimant’s allegation, the description of the insured activities and the relevant policy definitions may all need to be compared carefully.
No. Insurance Dispute Service is independent of Markel. The Markel name is used solely to identify an insurer that may be involved in a visitor’s professional indemnity claim or coverage dispute.
Insurance Dispute Service is independent of and is not affiliated with Markel, Markel International or any Markel group company. Markel and related trade names belong to their respective owners. References are included for identification and informational purposes only. Professional indemnity policies, underwriting entities and claims arrangements vary. This page provides general information and does not suggest that Markel has acted improperly in any individual matter. It is not legal advice and no particular outcome can be guaranteed.
Markel Questioning Your PI Cover?
If Markel has reserved its rights, questioned notification or declined some or all of your professional indemnity claim, send us the relevant policy and correspondence and we can consider whether the position may be suitable for independent review.