Business interruption disputes
Disagreements about insured damage, causation, prevention of access, indemnity periods, trends, gross profit, increased costs or savings.
Explore this claim typeCommercial insurance claim support
If your business insurance claim has been rejected, delayed or settled too low, we can examine the policy, the insurer’s reasoning, the expert and financial evidence and the proposed settlement before explaining the strongest realistic route forward.
Commercial claim expertise
Commercial policies often combine several sections of cover. Select the closest claim type below, or begin with a free review if the loss crosses more than one section or does not fit neatly into a single category.
Disagreements about insured damage, causation, prevention of access, indemnity periods, trends, gross profit, increased costs or savings.
Explore this claim typeCover is refused or restricted because of notification, known-circumstance, prior-knowledge, exclusion, defence-cost or indemnity issues.
Explore this claim typeDisputes about policy response, historic cover, employee status, notification, defence costs or the insurer’s indemnity position.
Explore this claim typeDamage, breakdown, theft, reinstatement, replacement, betterment, obsolescence, valuation and business-critical equipment disputes.
Explore this claim typeFire, flood, storm, escape of water, theft, subsidence and reinstatement claims involving premises, stock, fixtures or tenants’ improvements.
Explore this claim typeFarm property, livestock, crops, machinery, disease, interruption and specialist rural-policy disputes involving complex evidence and valuation.
Explore this claim typeTesting cover and financial loss
A business may establish that the policy responds but still disagree with the amount offered. Equally, a detailed loss calculation cannot overcome an incorrect coverage analysis. Both issues should be addressed in the right order.
The first stage is to identify the insured event, applicable section, policyholder and interest, causation and the effect of conditions, warranties, exclusions, disclosure and notification provisions.
Once cover is established, the policy’s settlement basis must be applied to reliable repair, replacement, accounting and valuation evidence, with proper treatment of limits, excesses, mitigation and any insured savings.
Challenging the insurer’s reasoning
Commercial policies can be detailed, but complexity is not a substitute for a clear, evidence-based decision. The insurer’s reasoning should be tested against the entire contract and the actual circumstances of the loss.
The insurer says the loss was not caused by an insured peril, the trigger is absent or another event was the dominant or effective cause.
Defective design, wear, gradual damage, cyber, pollution, disease, vacancy, contractual liability or another exclusion is said to remove cover.
The insurer alleges non-compliance with security, maintenance, inspection, fire protection, storage, occupancy or risk-management requirements.
The business is accused of failing to disclose a material circumstance, notify a claim promptly or report a circumstance that might give rise to one.
Declared values, sums insured or gross-profit estimates are said to be too low, resulting in a proportional reduction to the proposed settlement.
Forecasts, trends, margins, repair costs, asset values, stock records or mitigation expenses are rejected, adjusted or treated as insufficient.
Building a decision-ready case
The evidence required depends on the insurer’s stated position. A focused case identifies the real coverage and valuation issues without overwhelming the dispute with documents that do not answer them.
The schedule, wording, endorsements, proposal, statement of fact, renewal material, declared values and relevant broker correspondence.
Rejection or reservation letters, reports, information requests, calculations, settlement proposals and complaint responses.
Engineer, forensic, fire, surveyor, specialist, incident, maintenance, risk-control and third-party evidence relevant to coverage.
Accounts, management information, forecasts, stock and asset registers, estimates, invoices, mitigation records and loss calculations.
Looking at the whole insured position
A serious event can damage premises and equipment, interrupt trading, create additional operating costs and expose the business to third-party claims. Each element should be allocated to the correct cover and supported by evidence that follows the policy’s calculation and settlement terms.
The objective is not to inflate a claim. It is to ensure that covered losses are not omitted, duplicated or reduced through an incorrect application of wording, valuation, trends, limits, underinsurance or mitigation principles.
A proportionate route forward
Insurers are expected to handle claims promptly and fairly, provide reasonable guidance and progress information and not unreasonably reject them. The suitable escalation route depends on the policyholder’s status, eligibility, evidence, claim value, contractual position and applicable deadlines.
We examine the policy, insurer’s decision, technical position and financial material to identify the issues that genuinely determine the outcome.
The next step may involve focused evidence, structured correspondence, revised calculations, negotiation or a formal complaint to the insurer.
Depending on eligibility and the case, options may include the Financial Ombudsman Service, litigation support and advice or representation from a suitably qualified specialist barrister.
Business insurance claims
Practical answers about rejected, delayed and underpaid commercial claims.
We consider business interruption, commercial property, plant and machinery, professional indemnity, employers’ liability, agricultural and other commercial claims. The free initial review confirms whether the matter fits our service.
Potentially. The insurer’s reason should be compared with the complete policy, the actual cause and circumstances of the loss and the available technical and factual evidence. A rejection letter is the insurer’s position, not the final word.
The method depends on the wording and may involve revenue or gross profit, insured standing charges, trends, the indemnity period, increased costs, savings and limits. The calculation should use reliable business evidence.
The declared value or sum insured, the policy’s valuation basis and any average clause should be checked carefully. It may also be necessary to examine how the figures were prepared and whether broker advice contributed to the position.
It depends on the term, the facts, the policy and the relevant law. The insurer should identify the precise obligation, evidence of breach and the legal and contractual consequence it says follows rather than rely on a general assertion.
The insurance claim and any potential broker issue may need to be analysed separately. Placement, disclosure, sums insured, advice and communications can help establish which acts caused which part of the alleged loss.
Some micro-enterprises, small businesses, charities and trusts may be eligible, but the tests and time limits depend on status, size and circumstances. Larger or ineligible businesses may need to consider contractual negotiation or litigation.
High value does not automatically prevent an initial review. The suitable route depends on complexity, evidence, proportionality, our service scope, dispute stage and whether specialist expert, accounting, legal or barrister input is required.
Start with the policy schedule and wording, the insurer’s decision or latest position, the principal expert or loss-adjuster reports and the material showing the claimed financial loss. We can identify further evidence after that review.
Yes. The initial review is free. We will consider the information provided and explain whether we may be able to assist and what the next stage could involve. There is no obligation to proceed.