Review the Decision
We examine the policy wording, exclusions, endorsements, insurer correspondence and the precise reasons given for rejecting, delaying or reducing the claim.
Founder-led insurance dispute support
We help consumers and businesses understand, assess and challenge rejected, delayed and underpaid insurance claims. Our role is to examine the insurer’s reasoning, test it against the policy and evidence, and explain the strongest realistic route forward.
Why the service exists
Our role
We bring the policy, insurer’s decision and supporting evidence together so the dispute can be understood and approached in a structured way.
We examine the policy wording, exclusions, endorsements, insurer correspondence and the precise reasons given for rejecting, delaying or reducing the claim.
We assess valuations, repair scopes, reports, photographs, timelines and other material to identify the strengths, weaknesses and genuine points of disagreement.
We explain whether further insurer engagement, a formal complaint, the Financial Ombudsman, specialist evidence, litigation support or barrister involvement may be appropriate.
A structured assessment
Every claim is different, but the initial assessment follows a clear sequence designed to identify the real issue before further work is discussed.
We establish what happened, what was claimed, what the insurer has decided and what outcome the policyholder is seeking.
We compare the decision with the relevant cover, definitions, conditions, exclusions, endorsements and applicable policy version.
We review the available technical, financial and factual material and identify where evidence is missing, contested or capable of strengthening the position.
We outline the apparent strengths and weaknesses, further evidence required and the route that appears most proportionate to the value and complexity of the dispute.
The standards behind our work
Our aim is to give clients a clearer understanding of the dispute before they commit to further work, cost or escalation.
We examine the policy, insurer’s reasoning, calculations and available evidence rather than relying on the rejection headline alone.
We explain both the strengths and the weaknesses and do not present every disagreement as a claim that can or should be pursued.
If paid work may be appropriate, the proposed work and fee are explained before the client decides whether to proceed.
We aim to match the response to the evidence, value, complexity, urgency and stage reached—not escalate for the sake of it.
Different disputes require different routes
The strongest next step depends on the claimant, policy, evidence, value, eligibility, time limits and whether the insurer has already issued a final response.
A focused challenge can address the insurer’s reasoning, correct errors, present supporting evidence and identify the outcome being requested.
Where the claimant and complaint are eligible, the Financial Ombudsman may consider the policy, evidence, relevant law and whether the insurer acted fairly and reasonably.
Higher-value or legally complex disputes may require case preparation, pre-action work or proceedings, with specialist barrister involvement where appropriate.
Who we support
Support with rejected, underpaid or delayed home, contents, motor and other personal insurance claims.
Explore claim disagreements →Structured review of commercial property, interruption, stock, machinery and other business-insurance disputes.
Explore business claims →Defined-scope support for solicitors, accountants, brokers and other advisers assisting a client with an insurance dispute.
Professional referral information →What clients can expect
What we do not promise
Free initial review
Send the insurer’s decision, policy wording and the principal documents currently available. We will identify the information needed for an initial assessment.
Common questions
General information about who we help, how the review works and the routes that may be available.
We review disputed insurance claims, including the policy wording, insurer’s reasoning, supporting evidence, valuations and settlement calculations. We then explain the apparent strengths, weaknesses and realistic next-step options.
Insurance Dispute Service was founded by Gary Smith to provide consumers and businesses with informed, practical assistance when an insurance claim becomes a dispute.
Yes. We assess claims for individuals, households and commercial policyholders. The correct route can differ depending on the type of claimant, policy, value, evidence and eligibility for complaint services.
We review rejected claims, low settlement offers, delayed claims, non-disclosure allegations, policy exclusions, fraud allegations, underinsurance and disputes about wear and tear, as well as a range of personal and commercial claim types.
We identify what has happened, read the insurer’s decision and available policy material, consider the principal evidence and determine what further information may be needed before the realistic options can be explained.
Yes. The initial review is free, confidential and carries no obligation to proceed. If further paid work may be suitable, its proposed scope and pricing will be explained before you decide.
No. An insurance dispute depends on the policy, facts, evidence, applicable rules and stage reached. We provide an honest assessment and will explain where the available material does not support taking the matter further.
The initial review is free. If further work is considered appropriate, the proposed tasks and fee will be explained before any paid work begins, allowing you to make an informed decision.
Potentially, where the claimant and complaint are eligible. We can help examine the insurer’s final response, organise the relevant material and identify the issues that may need to be presented clearly.
Not always. A suitably trained and authorised Public/Direct Access barrister may potentially advise, draft documents and represent an individual or business without a solicitor. Not every matter is suitable, and separate litigation support or an authorised litigator may still be required.
Complete the Free Claim Review form with your contact details and a short explanation of the dispute. Include the insurer’s decision, policy wording and principal evidence where these are available.
Information on this page is general. The assistance and route available in any matter depend on the claimant, policy, facts, evidence, eligibility, applicable law and time limits.