No Clear Plan or Timescale
The insurer cannot explain which decision is outstanding, who is responsible for it or when the next meaningful update should be provided.
Insurance claim taking too long?
Some claims require detailed investigation. But you should still receive a clear explanation of what is outstanding, what is happening next and why the current timescale is reasonable. We review the claim history and help identify the strongest available route to meaningful progress.
Understanding the delay
There is no single deadline that applies to every insurance claim. A straightforward motor or contents claim may be resolved quickly, while a major property or commercial loss may require expert reports, financial evidence and detailed investigation.
The real question is whether the claim is being progressed promptly and fairly. A continuing investigation should have a purpose, a clear outstanding issue and a realistic next step—not repeated periods of silence or requests that lead nowhere.
Warning signs of a stalled claim
Delay alone does not prove poor handling. These are some of the patterns we examine when deciding whether the insurer’s progress and explanation appear open to challenge.
The insurer cannot explain which decision is outstanding, who is responsible for it or when the next meaningful update should be provided.
The same documents are requested more than once, or new requests arrive in stages without a clear explanation of why they were not identified earlier.
Reports, inspections or recommendations remain outstanding for extended periods and the insurer provides no effective plan for resolving the hold-up.
The file repeatedly moves between handlers, departments or external suppliers, causing duplicated work, inconsistent explanations or lost momentum.
Cover or settlement terms have been agreed, but payment, repairs, replacement or another promised step has not been progressed promptly.
The insurer continues to refer to enquiries or validation checks but does not identify what remains unresolved or how the current work affects the decision.
Approved repairs, parts, contractor appointments or authorisations remain delayed while the property or vehicle cannot be restored to normal use.
A delayed commercial claim can affect cash flow, premises, stock, customers and continuity. The growing practical consequences may require urgent, structured escalation.
Testing the progress
The answer depends on what the insurer needs to establish, the complexity and value of the loss, the availability of experts, the policyholder’s cooperation and the urgency of the circumstances.
A strong challenge separates unavoidable time from avoidable inactivity. We look at when information was requested and supplied, what reports were commissioned, whether promised dates were met and whether the insurer has explained the purpose of each continuing enquiry.
The aim is to create a precise record of where the claim has stopped moving and what reasonable action or decision should now be requested.
Choosing the right escalation
The appropriate route depends on the reason for the delay, the claimant, policy, value, urgency, evidence, time limits and stage already reached.
A structured request can identify the outstanding decision, record what has already been supplied and require a clear explanation of the next action, responsibility and proposed timescale.
A complaint can address the handling and communication failures as well as the underlying claim. Where eligible, the Financial Ombudsman may review the insurer’s conduct after a final response or the applicable complaint-response period.
Higher-value, urgent or legally complex disputes may require pre-action work or proceedings. We can help prepare the case and coordinate suitable specialist barrister involvement where appropriate.
Direct/Public Access can allow an authorised barrister to advise, draft and represent without a solicitor. Many barristers do not conduct the day-to-day litigation, so a solicitor or authorised litigator may still be needed in some cases.
A focused initial assessment
The initial review is designed to identify what is causing the delay, whether the current handling appears reasonable and which step may produce meaningful progress.
Request My Free Claim ReviewProvide the policy, principal claim communications, reports and any record of missed deadlines or unanswered requests.
We identify what has happened, what remains outstanding and where responsibility for the current delay appears to sit.
We consider the complexity, evidence, communication, promised actions and whether the continuing investigation has a clear and reasonable purpose.
We outline the strongest apparent next step, any further information required and what could happen next.
Delays across different policies
Explore common claim types or begin a review if your delayed insurance claim does not fit neatly into one category.
For solicitors and professional advisers
We work with solicitors, accountants, brokers and other professional advisers who require focused assistance reviewing a delayed claim, reconstructing the timeline and identifying an appropriate escalation route.
View Professional Referral InformationCommon questions
These answers provide general guidance. The correct approach depends on the policy, claimant, evidence, urgency and stage reached.
There is no single period for every claim. The reasonable timescale depends on matters including the type and complexity of the loss, the investigations required, the availability of evidence and experts, and whether the parties are responding promptly. The insurer should still explain the progress and outstanding steps.
Ask for a written explanation identifying what remains outstanding, who is responsible for the next action and when it is expected. Provide any genuinely outstanding information promptly and keep a clear record. If progress remains inadequate, a formal complaint or another escalation route may be appropriate.
An insurer may need relevant information to investigate and value a claim. The important questions are why the information is required, whether it has already been provided, whether requests are being made efficiently and whether the insurer explains how the material affects its decision.
Record the unanswered communications and send a focused written request for the current position, outstanding action and response date. If the insurer still does not provide a meaningful update, consider using its formal complaints procedure.
Potentially. A complaint can concern the way the claim is being handled, including delay and communication, even if the insurer has not yet made the final coverage or settlement decision. The complaint should identify the handling failures and the action requested.
The insurer generally needs the opportunity to investigate the complaint first. For most complaints it has up to eight weeks to issue a final response. An eligible complainant may normally refer the matter after the final response or once that period has expired. A six-month referral limit usually runs from the final response, subject to exceptions.
Ask whether the delay concerns liability, engineering evidence, valuation, parts, repair authorisation or payment. Request the expected date for the next decision and provide any outstanding material. Continued unexplained delay or poor communication may justify a formal complaint.
Potentially. A suitably trained and authorised Public/Direct Access barrister may advise, draft documents and represent an individual or business without a solicitor. Not every matter is suitable, and separate litigation support or an authorised litigator may still be required.
Yes. The initial review is free and there is no obligation to proceed. If further work may be appropriate, the proposed scope and pricing will be explained before you decide whether to continue.
Information on this page is general and does not guarantee that a claim will be resolved more quickly. Each matter depends on its facts, policy wording, evidence, eligibility and applicable time limits.