Claim Rejected
Coverage, causation or another technical issue is being relied upon to refuse all or part of the claim.
Loss Adjusting · Claims Management · Delegated Claims
If Charles Taylor is handling or adjusting your claim, it may be doing considerably more than simply gathering information. Depending on the appointment, it may be investigating the loss, assessing technical evidence, managing the claim or exercising authority delegated by an insurer.
Insurance Dispute Service can independently review Charles Taylor-related claims where there is disagreement over coverage, causation, valuation, technical evidence, liability, delay or the decision reached through the claims process.
Charles Taylor states that its group handles more than 3.6 million claims each year. Its wider Claims Solutions operation includes more than 2,000 claims-focused staff across more than 120 locations, covering adjusting, third-party administration and specialist claims services.
Your Problem
Usually because Charles Taylor has become part of the decision chain and the resulting claim position has created a substantial problem.
Coverage, causation or another technical issue is being relied upon to refuse all or part of the claim.
The proposed valuation does not appear to reflect the actual insured loss.
An adjuster, engineer, surveyor or other specialist has reached a conclusion you believe is wrong.
Property damage, business interruption or specialist risks have created a high-value dispute.
It is difficult to establish whether Charles Taylor or the underlying insurer controls the disputed decision.
Charles Taylor is investigating liability, professional or other losses in which your business is involved.
Who Is Charles Taylor?
Charles Taylor provides a wide range of insurance-market services, including specialist loss adjusting and third-party claims administration.
Its adjusting operation handles commercial claims across areas including property, casualty, aviation, marine, natural resources, technical risks and other specialist classes.
Its TPA and claims-management businesses can also operate across much of the claims lifecycle.
That means the Charles Taylor name on correspondence does not, by itself, tell you precisely what authority it has. The appointment and decision chain need to be established from the individual claim.
How Did Charles Taylor Become Involved?
A commercial or specialist claim might broadly develop like this.
Insurance may be arranged through an insurer, broker, MGA, Lloyd’s market or other structure.
Property damage, liability, engineering, marine, energy or another insured event occurs.
Adjusting, claims-management or specialist expertise is brought into the process.
Coverage, causation, liability, damage and financial quantum may all be investigated.
The resulting decision, recommendation or settlement becomes disputed.
Important: this is illustrative only. Charles Taylor provides both adjusting and claims-management services, including delegated claims arrangements, so the actual authority exercised in an individual claim should be established rather than assumed.
This is the most important feature of this particular company page.
Charles Taylor provides claims-management services within the Lloyd’s and London Market and specifically offers delegated lead claims services, surge and volume claims handling and support for run-off books.
Its claims-management operation can also provide a white-labelled service designed to operate as an extension of an insurer’s internal claims team.
The practical implication is important: we should never assume that Charles Taylor merely wrote a report while somebody else made every decision.
We identify what authority Charles Taylor actually had, which insurer or market participant ultimately stands behind the policy and who can reconsider the disputed claim position.
What Role Might Charles Taylor Be Performing?
Investigating a loss and assessing technical, policy and financial issues.
Managing claims through substantial parts of the claims lifecycle.
Handling claims under authority provided through a particular insurance arrangement.
Adjusting technically demanding and substantial commercial insurance claims.
Claims involving construction professionals, engineers, surveyors and other specialist risks.
Specialist adjusting across complex international and commercial insurance classes.
What Can Be Challenged?
Does the insurance wording genuinely support the coverage position being applied?
What factual, engineering or forensic evidence establishes the cause?
Has the full physical and consequential loss been identified?
Is the methodology used to calculate the loss reasonable and supported?
Are financial assumptions, mitigation and loss periods accurately reflected?
Does the evidence actually establish responsibility for the alleged loss?
Do engineering, surveying or other expert findings withstand independent scrutiny?
Who actually decided the claim and who has authority to reconsider it?
Large or Specialist Claim?
Charles Taylor describes its adjusting business as focusing on commercial claims, many of which are large and complex.
Specialist teams operate across areas including property and casualty, aviation, marine, natural resources, technical risks and other specialist insurance classes.
These claims can involve several expert disciplines, multiple insurers, international interests and very substantial financial exposures.
When that happens, identifying the decisive issue becomes particularly important. A technically complicated file can still turn on one disputed question of causation, wording, liability or quantum.
Construction or Professional Indemnity Claim?
Its Construction Professional Indemnity operation covers claims involving contractors, architects, engineers, specialist subcontractors, building surveyors, quantity surveyors, insurance brokers and other professionals.
Charles Taylor states that its specialist team includes adjusters with construction backgrounds alongside quantity surveyors and engineers able to provide technical and quantum analysis.
Where your business or professional practice is involved, the issues may include both liability for the underlying allegation and whether the professional-indemnity policy responds.
Explore Professional & Business Claims Defence →The file may include specialist adjusting reports, policy arguments, expert evidence, complex valuations and several organisations participating in the claims process.
You may not even know whether Charles Taylor has merely advised the insurer or has authority to determine important aspects of the claim.
The real questions are: who made the decision, what evidence produced it and which part of the position is capable of being challenged?
Insurance Dispute Service can review the policy, Charles Taylor correspondence, adjusting reports, expert material, valuations, calculations and insurer documentation.
We identify Charles Taylor’s role and authority, the evidence behind the disputed conclusion, who ultimately controls the claim and where there may be a realistic route to challenge the position.
Depending on the dispute, that may lead to further evidence, insurer challenge, negotiation, expert input, claims defence, barrister advice or litigation support.
What to Send Us
Related IDS Support
Commercial property, business interruption and other substantial insurance disputes.
Business claims → Insurance Settlement Too LowWhere valuation, scope or financial-loss calculations leave a material shortfall.
Underpaid claims → Claims Against Your BusinessWhere Charles Taylor is investigating liability or a professional claim involving your business.
Claims Defence → Insurers & Claims HandlersIdentify another insurer, adjuster or claims organisation involved in the decision chain.
View company directory →Frequently Asked Questions
Not necessarily. Charles Taylor provides loss adjusting, claims management and third-party administration services. The insurer providing the insurance contract should be identified from the policy schedule and wording.
An insurer, Lloyd’s market participant, MGA or other organisation may appoint Charles Taylor to provide adjusting, claims management or specialist technical services.
The answer depends on the particular appointment and authority delegated to it. Charles Taylor provides both traditional loss-adjusting services and delegated claims-management services, so the individual decision-making structure should be established rather than assumed.
A report can be examined against the policy wording, factual evidence, photographs, technical reports, valuations, quotations and other evidence. Whether a viable challenge exists depends on the particular claim.
In some insurance arrangements an insurer or other market participant gives another organisation authority to undertake specified claims functions. The scope of that authority varies, so the relevant appointment and correspondence need to be considered in the individual claim.
Charles Taylor has specialist professional-indemnity capabilities, including construction PI claims involving contractors, architects, engineers, surveyors and other professionals.
Establish who is making the claim, what liability is alleged, what evidence supports it, how the loss has been calculated and whether your own insurance should respond. Investigation alone does not establish liability.
No. Insurance Dispute Service is independent of Charles Taylor. The company name is used only to identify an organisation that may be involved in a visitor’s insurance dispute.
Insurance Dispute Service is independent of and is not affiliated with Charles Taylor, Charles Taylor Adjusting or any related company. Charles Taylor and associated trade names belong to their respective owners. References are included for identification and informational purposes only. Charles Taylor performs different roles under different appointments and nothing on this page implies that Charles Taylor has acted improperly in any individual matter. This page provides general information only, is not legal advice and no particular outcome can be guaranteed.
Charles Taylor Handling Your Claim?
If a claim involving Charles Taylor has been rejected, underpaid, delayed or become technically complex, send us the relevant policy, correspondence, reports and valuations and we can consider whether the position may be suitable for independent review.