Cancellation or curtailment rejected
The insurer says the reason for cancelling or cutting short the trip is not one of the insured events listed in the policy.
Travel insurance claim disputes
Travel insurance claims can be rejected or reduced because of cancellation wording, pre-existing medical conditions, a change in health, missed departure rules, baggage limits, medical expenses or another policy exclusion. We review the policy, evidence and insurer's reasoning before identifying the strongest realistic next step.
Why travel insurance claims become disputed
The key issue is usually whether the event that caused the loss falls within an insured section of the policy and whether an exclusion, limit or alternative recovery affects what the insurer must pay.
The insurer says the reason for cancelling or cutting short the trip is not one of the insured events listed in the policy.
The claim is declined because the insurer says the illness or treatment was linked to a condition that existed before cover or was not properly declared.
Emergency treatment, hospital costs or repatriation are refused, delayed or restricted because the insurer disputes necessity, cover or the medical evidence.
The insurer says the reason for the delay is not covered, insufficient time was allowed, or the policy's delay or abandonment threshold was not met.
Lost or damaged items are reduced because of depreciation, evidence of ownership, single-item limits, excesses or another valuation restriction.
The insurer relies on wording relating to war, civil disruption, terrorism, government advice or another general policy exclusion.
What IDS reviews
Travel disputes can involve several organisations at once: the insurer, airline, tour operator, hotel or medical provider. We focus the review on the insured loss, what can be recovered elsewhere and the specific policy wording the insurer relies upon.
We identify the section being claimed under and whether the circumstances satisfy the policy definition for cancellation, medical expenses, delay, baggage or another benefit.
Medical records, airline or travel-provider correspondence, booking documents, delay evidence, receipts and other relevant material are compared with the insurer's reasoning.
We examine any exclusion relied upon and whether part of the loss should first be recovered from an airline, tour operator, card provider or another source.
Where a claim is accepted but underpaid, we look at excesses, single-item limits, depreciation, medical costs, fixed-delay benefits and the basis of the insurer's calculation.
Financial Ombudsman approach
The Financial Ombudsman says it commonly sees travel insurance complaints where a claim has been declined, the amount paid is disputed, exclusions were not understood when the policy was bought, or a change in health affected cover.
It looks at the policy wording, evidence of what caused the loss, the insurer's handling of the claim and whether the decision was fair. For medical-expense and repatriation complaints, it may also consider whether treatment was medically necessary and whether a pre-existing condition genuinely caused or contributed to the claim.
Read the Financial Ombudsman's current guidance on travel insurance complaints.
How we approach the dispute
The aim is to identify the insured event, isolate the exclusion or calculation in dispute and organise the evidence around the exact reason the insurer says it will not pay.
We establish which policy section applies, what financial loss is being claimed and whether another provider should meet part of it first.
The policy, travel documents, medical evidence, receipts and insurer correspondence are reviewed against the stated reason for refusal or reduction.
The next step may involve further evidence, a structured complaint, FOS where eligible, or more formal dispute support in suitable higher-value cases.
What to send us
You do not need to organise every receipt before contacting us. Send what you have and we can identify which further documents may matter.
When the dispute needs to go further
Many travel disputes are suitable for complaint and Ombudsman routes, but some claims involve substantial overseas medical expenses, serious injury, repatriation costs or complex legal issues. IDS can help organise the evidence and, where appropriate, support escalation through more formal routes.
Common questions